Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 338.

  • Guess Who´s Back...

    chitz - - DE - Blogs

    Post

    Quote from lnternet: “Ja Mann der Corona Boom, darauf haben wir gewartet ” Bist doch nur neidisch, weil alle deine Kryptos in' Arsch gehen

  • Guess Who´s Back...

    chitz - - DE - Blogs

    Post

    Der Graph behinhaltet keinen rake. Deswegen hat auch jeder streamer ~10bb/100 und sagt dann "ololololo GG ist so soft, müsst ihr unbedingt spielen, hier ist mein affi link!" Ich glaub NL200 ist auf GG nur schwer schlagbar, einfach weil der rake so extrem hoch ist, 5% rake capped bei 6$ und preflop wird auch noch geraked. RB ist ähnlich wie bei Stars, regs bekommen weniger. Wieviel am ende von den "70+% RB" tatsächlich ankommt kann ich dir leider nicht sagen

  • Oh junge, Jonas hat neue Mods eingestellt, jetzt werden dem Tiger endlich die Ketten abgenommen!

  • Timbeys und Challenges

    chitz - - DE - Blogs

    Post

    Can confirm. Nach einem kleinem Downswing einfach mal paar Wochen Stars meiden und schon kriegt man ganz gutes rakeback. Ist schon sick wieviel mehr rb losingplayer durch chests bekommen und dann noch die 40% rb challenge...

  • HM2 issues

    chitz - - EN - General

    Post

    HM2 is quite buggy, because they dont really update anymore. So whenever a site makes changes chances are that HM2 is getting worse. Probably the easiest way out is getting another tracker.

  • Here we g(t)o

    chitz - - DE - Blogs

    Post

    Quote from yeah.rocketscience: “wer sagt das ich privat nicht gut aufgestellt bin? ” Man könnte es auch bisschen weiter ausführen, aber ich glaube das reicht: Quote from yeah.rocketscience: “Mache es nur kurz, glaube bin wieder in eine Depressive Phase gerutscht ”

  • Here we g(t)o

    chitz - - DE - Blogs

    Post

    Wenn du Privat einigermaßen gut aufgestellt wärest, dann könntest du wahrscheinlich auch darüber lachen. Ist halt schwer wenn man nur knapp über Mindestlohn verdient und die Hoffnung hat doch noch Pokerprofi zu werden. Da hilft beim Downswing auch das beste Mindset nicht weiter und da vertiltet man auch schnell mal 1000+bb. Wenn du mal ehrlich zu dir selbst wärest, dann würdest du einsehen, dass du derzeit einfach nicht gut aufgestellt bist um im Poker was zu reißen. Vom fehlenden Talent mal abg…

  • Here we g(t)o

    chitz - - DE - Blogs

    Post

    Stars ist rigged, das ist eh klar, wurde schon mehrfach bewiesen! Hier ein Beweis: streamable.com/s1c5l Top top Spieler gehn immer in arsch, Fische werden immer belohnt! Es ist Bedrug!

  • Here we g(t)o

    chitz - - DE - Blogs

    Post

    Mit solchen Plays und dem ganzen rumgewhine kannst du der neue Captain werden! Werf den Stream an, ich donate auch ein paar $$$ für Alk

  • Here we g(t)o

    chitz - - DE - Blogs

    Post

    Ein gut gemeinter Rat: Quit Poker.

  • NL10 - RCB/Shove

    chitz - - EN - Strategy & Hand Discussion

    Post

    1) You can account for that using Equilab just solve this: 0 = %fold*(pot+bet) + (1 - %fold)*EQ*(pot+2*bet) - bet just put in the Equity u think villain has left if we call his jam and solve for the frequency. 2) Not sure if I was unclear here, but I dont expect KK to be 0EV. Its more like "If KK was 0EV, how should villains range look like in this case?" this reasoning is purely exploitive, thus results may be very far from optimal. 2.1) yes 2.2) yes 2.3) if KK is never <0EV, then we can always…

  • NL10 - RCB/Shove

    chitz - - EN - Strategy & Hand Discussion

    Post

    Not sure if we misunderstood each other: Quote from undisturbed: “Quote from chitz: “Since your line is pretty standard there should be no question regarding it. This makes the Hand pretty easy to analyze. 1) Think about how far up you are in your range estimate your weakest hand to defend vs good unknown player ( = how much do you have to defend, to not give villain autoprofit by jamming any2) 2) Open equilab and give villain some ranges and try to find some ranges where the EV of calling with …

  • NL10 - RCB/Shove

    chitz - - EN - Strategy & Hand Discussion

    Post

    Quote from motiejus: “Can't catch a break for some time now, so get to second guess some spots, but it's a snap GII > move on type of hand, or i'm i missing something here...? ” Yes, just wanted to give him some tools to find out by himself and let him do the work.

  • NL10 - RCB/Shove

    chitz - - EN - Strategy & Hand Discussion

    Post

    1) On the Flop villain raises 3$ into a 3$ pot (including your bet) this means, if he does that with 0% Equity (a pure bluff), then his bluff would generate 0 EV, if you defend 50% of your range. if you defend less, then villain has can do this all the time with any2 and will take your money. To find more about this topic, google Minimum Defense Frequency(MDF). 2) You assign a value range to villain, 99, 65s, A5s, JJ.... Then you give him some bluffs and look how many hands he has to bluff, to m…

  • NL10 - RCB/Shove

    chitz - - EN - Strategy & Hand Discussion

    Post

    Since your line is pretty standard there should be no question regarding it. This makes the Hand pretty easy to analyze. 1) Think about how far up you are in your range estimate your weakest hand to defend vs good unknown player ( = how much do you have to defend, to not give villain autoprofit by jamming any2) 2) Open equilab and give villain some ranges and try to find some ranges where the EV of calling with KK is 0. Then ask yourself if your villain is likely to play like this. If not, do yo…

  • NL10 - RCB/Shove

    chitz - - EN - Strategy & Hand Discussion

    Post

    Would you like to share your thoughts here?

  • Highstakes

    chitz - - EN - Blogs

    Post

    WTF, nice WCOOP ship! GG!

  • So betting range on flop is way worse than I thought, good to know .

  • Quote from motiejus: “Interestingly, as CO solver mixes betting and checking hard and that includes checking back with all sorts of hands, up to the nuts pokermarket.com/forum/attachme…7d8a1715e036b1fc1f771dac7 ” Imo this is not too surprising, because SB range is still uncapped. This is very similar to SRP BUvBB on the same board structure. Small sizing, low frequency and checking roughly 50% of flushes. You could lock solver into 33% betting range as SB to see how big of a mistake your initial…

  • I also thought that we could play turn like this with JT+, since villain checked Flop. In theory I think villain should checkback quite often, but I think most regs are cbetting their 8x and value hands more frequently than they should in this spot. Quote from motiejus: “Overall i don't really remember why did i use this particular size, might have been just random size due to timer going down, at the same time IT COULD HAVE BEEN the case that i wanted to have a more "reasonable" size to GII on …